Comparative Analysis of AirGradient ONE and Airthings Air Quality Monitors

Air Quality Monitors Compared: AirGradient One vs. Airthings

The article compares two popular air quality monitors: AirGradient ONE and Airthings View Plus. It highlights the growing awareness of indoor air pollution and the accessibility of modern monitoring devices. While Airthings is praised for its user-friendly interface, there are concerns regarding ownership rights over the data collected by its devices, which are heavily restricted. In contrast, AirGradient emphasizes user ownership of data, modularity, and open-source hardware, enabling easier repairs and modifications.

Sensor capabilities are compared, revealing that the AirGradient ONE includes a NOx sensor, while Airthings features a radon sensor. The accuracy of both monitors is discussed, noting that while similar in performance, the AirGradient sensor has a longer lifespan and better calibration flexibility.

Design and connectivity options are also evaluated, with AirGradient offering a WiFi connection to an online dashboard, whereas Airthings uses Bluetooth with optional WiFi connection via an app. Price is another key differentiator, with the AirGradient ONE being more affordable. The article concludes by addressing issues such as data ownership, sensor accuracy, and effective pricing strategies, advocating for user rights and accessibility in air quality monitoring.

Comments

Skeptical

Concerns are raised about data ownership with AirThings devices, with some users wanting more transparency regarding data usage and access.
There is interest in additional monitoring options like radon sensors, but limited availability of affordable and reliable units.
Some users express frustration with auto calibration settings on air quality monitors, which can lead to unreliable readings.
There is a contrast between user experiences, with some saying their devices performed well while others reported erratic outputs and questioned the overall quality.
Some users prefer AirGradient devices due to easier setup and flexibility, particularly in integrating with local home automation systems.
Discussion highlights the importance of user engagement with device manufacturers and the need for better communication regarding product issues.
DIY kits for air quality monitoring have mixed reviews; some users appreciate the cost-saving aspect, while others prefer factory-tested assembled options.
Users report dissatisfaction with the build quality and longevity of the IQAir AirVisual Pro, citing issues like a flimsy design and display brightness.
Majority agree that consumer-grade air quality sensors do not meet professional standards, with a call for higher quality components.
Community feedback on the frequent self-promotion by AirGradient prompts some users to label it as spammy, questioning the authenticity of positive sentiments.

View Comments1 day ago